Master Cat Cory Milles contrasts The Dark Knight with Batman v. Superman to demonstrate the power of stakes that are personal. Give your audiences “moral questions” that they can relate to — and will care about.
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Android | RSS
2 Comments
Comments are closed.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Cory,
I enjoyed your podcast. You produced an insightful analysis of both movies, but especially The Dark Knight.
While I listened to it, a writing principle I use when crafting stories came to mind. It’s one of Lisa Cron’s 12 Hardwired Expectations Every Reader Has. In this article, she says the sixth expectation every reader has is, “The reader expects there will be something crucial at stake, continually forcing the protagonist’s hand.” The key element you brought out in your analysis of The Dark Knight is a prime example of this expectation visually met in a film.
The Joker continually forced Batman’s hand by raising the stakes at every turn.
I believe this is one of the elements that led to the film’s success.
Looking forward to more Podcats.
A more important point of the ferries scenario , is that the choice made by Batman, at the end, was based on a false premise. The choices made by the passengers on the ferries, indicated that the public would have been able to cope with the moral change of Harvey Dent.