You may call it Act 1, Act 2, and Act 3, but I call ’em “Thesis,” “Anti-thesis,” and “Synthesis.”
The three worlds of a screenplay are just that, different places with different demands. When deconstructing a script in class, or in a studio consultation, this is where I always start: the big picture, the overview. Examining the “three worlds” not only shows “How does it begin and how does it end?” it reveals the process of the hero’s “transformation” in a way that is the starting point of any discussion about “fixing” a script. A good example of the “three worlds” in action is seen in the #2 movie of the weekend, Wanted.
Wanted is fun action picture, and while I shy away from movies that encourage their teen audience to shoot people as a way to get results (Grand Theft Auto IV dude, about as scary as it gets), there is a style to the violence that is new and terribly intoxicating. But as a structuralist, I am most concerned with how it works.
Wanted works like Matrix. A naif, an innocent, a cubicle dweller with a dead end life, is told on page 12 that in fact he is a natural born assassin. After the normal guy hesitancy to join up — even though doing so means hanging out with Angelina Jolie — our hero succumbs and his training begins. This section is just part of the “upside-down version of the world,” the Anti-thesis of everything our hero, and we, think of as “normal.” And “training” is always a big part of any “Fun and Games” rise to the “false victory” of Midpoint.
And yet, the funhouse-mirror reflection characters that appear here are just like those Dorothy finds in Wizard of Oz. What were farmhands and mean teachers and sideshow medicine men become in the “Anti-thesis” world scarecrows and wicked witches and wizards. So it is in Wanted, as our hero finds a whole new pecking order at “work.” If he thought being a cubicle dweller was tough, his coffee breaks now include dips in a pool of electrolytes to speed recovery from his knife cuts and broken bones.
But that’s World Two for ya. And “Anti-thesis” is just the beginning of change this hero will undergo. It’s like Training Day, in that regard, in which we begin the movie with an “ethical” but naive hero, throw him into the upside-down world where the rules no longer apply, and now force him to choose a “third way.”
And again, just like Training Day, when that world proves to be false, and falsely embracing, we must change yet again. In Wanted‘s “All Is Lost” the hero (James McAvoy) is “worse off than when this movie started” and the “whiff of death” includes almost being killed while losing the “mentor” that didn’t seem to be so when we first met him. The compare-and-contrast between these two dead teachers in Training Day (Scott Glenn) and Wanted (Thomas Kretschmann) tells us how very similar these two stories are too.
The “third way” the hero seeks is a combination of what he was and what he’s learned. The hero can no longer go back to the life he had before, but he can’t stay where he is either. In the “netherworld” of “Dark Night of the Soul,” he must find a new answer — and he does! Wanted‘s Act Three “Synthesis” includes the “Five Point Finale” and a “Storming the Castle” sequence that actually is a castle! Love it when that happens!
By the end, Wanted‘s hero is “transformed” having crossed through three worlds: Thesis- Anti-thesis-Synthesis. Yes, the special effects are great, yes, the story is compelling, but it’s this transformation that makes it the most satisfying part of any movie, and what we all seek — audience and writer.
9 Comments
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.






Interesting… My brother and I were about to see Wanted on Friday, because we were surprised by the decent reviews it got. I expected it to be just a popcorn flick. But apparently the story was right on, which is what I figured.
We saw the Hulk instead. A good movie. Not quite Iron Man, but it was much better than the last one.
BTW, have I missed something? I’ve read both STC’s and I haven’t seen anything about the “Five Point Finale” in the books, but I’ve seen it mentioned a few times here on the blog.
Is it possible I read over it? Or is it something that’s explained in the workshops and/or STC 3?
I was thinking the same thing Garrett. I don’t remember a “five point finale” being explained and was anxious to get home and dive into my cat books again.
-Jim
The “Five Point Finale” can be found in brief in the Blog Archives of the site I believe under that title. A fuller explanation of this and other new tools is coming soon in Book 3. Thanks guys!
Thank you Mr. Snyder!
Here is the link:
http://www.epopp.com/savethecat/2007/12/17/the-five-step-finale/
-Jim
I saw Wanted last night and I have to say, it’s a damn good movie! I mean, damn good. It’s textbook structure, gads of fun, ridiculous and very very fun. Every writer will love this movie. It’s a very satisfying action flick. Good stuff. Go, everyone. You shall love and learn.
I watched this movie yesterday and thought it was decent. It wasn’t amazing, but solid. The worst part for me was the over-use of voice over. It felt like the writer’s didn’t stick to the “show, don’t tell” saying. If they insisted on using voice over, they could have done it in a better way. When the main protagonist is in his office being chewed out, they used the voice over to describe his feelings/mood, and it felt completely unneeded. I GOT that he hated his boss, it was obvious. Instead he should have been saying something else in the voice over, in addition to what is on screen, to add an emphasis of how much he hated his current position in life.
While it may have hit its structure points, I found “Wanted” lacking in a few areas:
1) A “Save The Cat” moment for the main character. I really didn’t care much about him.
2) There was no meaningful theme. As a result it was fairly forgettable, after the stylistic action scenes and pyrotechnics were over.
3) I agree with the earlier poster. The voice over was annoying. It told us things that were already obvious.
4) Some of the dialogue felt “on the nose” to me.
I loved this movie. The voice-over worked for me because it was funny, like “Fight Club”. I sat there laughing as it hit each beat with Swiss watch precision. It was basically an adult version of “Harry Potter” to me. And the movie does have a theme.
FOX: You apologize too much.
The movie’s theme is believing you have a right to control your life without apology. Hence the closing lines, “This is me taking back control of my life. What the fuck have you done lately?”
Oh, I think the theme was articulated way late for me in the movie (it probably was at the five minute mark but I have to see it again, I was so engrossed), but when Angelina was beating the crap out of him, asking over and over again, WHY ARE YOU HERE? And he answers “Who am I?”…I loved that. I thought that was what the movie was about…perhaps I’m wrong, but it felt a great rush in that scene. I actually teared up. ha!